The challenge
A client asked us to design a strategy that would prevent a sharp price drop while a large block of sell orders was expected to hit the market in a short window. The goal wasn’t just to “hold the line”; it was to keep trading healthy, fair and attractive for real buyers and sellers without overspending the treasury.
Services engaged
Consulting and Liquidity Provision delivered as a single, coordinated execution plan.
Our approach
We began with a forensic review of the token’s trading history to understand how previous sell events propagated through the order book. That analysis revealed where depth routinely vanished, what venues amplified slippage, and how quickly spreads widened during stress. From there, we built a strategy that combined two complementary levers.
The first lever was price maintenance at defined levels. We concentrated the maximum safe number of resting orders at pre-agreed price bands so that expected selling pressure would meet real liquidity rather than thin air. This kept spreads disciplined and discouraged cascade selling.
The second lever was soft price control. Instead of forcing a flatline, we allowed the market to breathe—brief, controlled damp/pump movements within a narrow corridor that reflect authentic activity. This micro-flexibility reduces the urge to “front-run a wall” and makes the chart look natural to traders who are scanning for genuine flow.
Balancing the two levers was not static. We adjusted the mix based on reputation risk, venue behavior and available budget for development. Throughout execution, we monitored panic-sale signatures—accelerating sell-through, depth evaporation and order-book imbalance—and reacted quickly with targeted replenishment rather than blunt, costly intervention. The result was the same protection against a dump at a fraction of the token support budget typically assumed for such scenarios.
Risk controls and reporting
Market health was checked in real time using depth bands around mid-price, effective spread, realized slippage and venue-level fill ratios. When thresholds were breached, circuit rules escalated from soft control to additional maintenance liquidity and then de-escalated as conditions normalized. The client received clear reports that tied actions to outcomes, not just to raw volume.
Results
The token price stabilized through the at-risk window while consuming about 50% of the originally calculated budget. After the event, the Token/USDT pair reverted to its average natural volatility, order books remained two-sided, and traders consistently transacted at fair prices. The chart looked clean and investable, which encouraged more organic participation than before.
What this means for your token
Dump prevention is not about overpowering the market; it is about engineering credible liquidity so sellers can exit without triggering a spiral and buyers see a chart they can trust. When done correctly, volatility stabilizes, confidence returns, and your treasury spends less to achieve more.
When to use this strategy
This hybrid approach is ideal when you anticipate concentrated sell pressure from unlocks, treasury moves, marketing distributions or cross-venue inventory shifts. It is equally effective for projects that need to transition from reactive firefighting to a proactive liquidity playbook.
Work with BeLiquid
If you’re facing concentrated sell pressure or persistent instability, we can design a liquidity plan that protects price, keeps trading natural and optimizes cost.
Show us your chart – get a practical liquidity approach aligned with your tokenomics!
